There is something fundamentally different with how computers sent a DVI signal when these were made in 2007. The manufacturer cranked saturation and vibrance to make the screens grab your attention better on the shelf, but without an OSD it can’t be corrected with a mere ICC profile. My question is: what’s the deal with these things? Anybody else used this model have a similar experience? I can’t shake the feeling that if the screens were ACTUALLY this bad then where would be news stories about people going blind. I’ve also played with color levels in the NVIDIA control panel, but the software ended up being inconsistent enough that I abandoned that path. This is partly because there’s only so much you can do without in-monitor color control I suppose. I wish I could go back to not knowing that you even COULD calibrate a monitor, but I digress.Įven after picking up an i1Display Pro and calibrating these screens with many, many different settings, the colors appear blown to the moon and the text is soft and difficult to read. These lead me down a rabbit hole of how the brain in a display works, display standards (ew) and calibration. There isn’t any kind of OSD, just basic brightness control that isn’t persistent when they lose power. They were originally meant for a friend of mine, but he ended up not liking them (for reason’s I’ll explain below) so I swapped them out for a couple others I had on hand. I bought two old Dell 3007wfp-hc’s about a year ago. I tried to take pictures to help illustrate what I’m describing, but my phone mysteriously hid the bulk of the problems when I took the picture.
0 kommentar(er)
